So like to clarify, experientially I still suffer from a deep-seated belief that people are separate independent doer entities. However intellectually, it baffles me that people, including myself, believe in personal agency. Even if you believe that the body's movements are controlled by your thoughts, in what sense can you believe that there is a "me" pilot ("ego") creating the thoughts? Thoughts are objects in the life experience, this is a classical advaita concept. There are physical objects, such as your body and the world, emotional objects like joy, love, sadness, anger, and there are thought objects, like thoughts and headmates and so on. All of them arise as part of a life experience arising in impersonal consciousness.
Like, if you're arguing agency, are you arguing that you wake up in the morning and plan out all of your thoughts for the day? Or do you plan them two seconds ahead? Do you decide the direction of your thoughts? If yes, what are you going to think about in five seconds from now?
There is no "me" that exists and controls the thoughts. The only "I/me/mine" that exists is the word that arises in "our" thought narrative about the circumstantial aspect of the life experience "witnessed" by consciousness (formless awareness + the impersonal sense of existing). @Calyra 👻 (edited)